| |
Attorney General Gansler Leads Effort to Support
Plaintiffs in Exxon Valdez Case
BALTIMORE,
MD (January 30, 2008) – Attorney
General Douglas F. Gansler announced today that Maryland has taken
the lead role
in support of the plaintiffs in a major case involving the 1989
Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska. Thirty-three other states have
signed on to Maryland’s amicus
curiae brief in Baker vs. Exxon, which will be argued in the United States Supreme Court
this year. Attorney General Gansler and Washington Attorney General
Rob McKenna (R. WA) co-signed a letter to Attorneys General nationwide,
encouraging them to join the brief prepared by Gansler’s
office. The brief supports the claims of commercial fisherman,
Native Alaskans, private landowners, and an array of businesses
that depended on the pristine environment and fisheries of Alaska’s
Prince William Sound.
The brief argues that since 48 states allow punitive damages, federal
maritime law should hold corporations accountable for recklessness
occurring on the water to the same extent that state law holds
them accountable for land-based misconduct. The brief also contends
that the court should reject Exxon’s argument that the federal
Clean Water Act precludes federal maritime law from providing for
punitive damages.
“The reckless discharge of toxic material into our coastal
waters will not be tolerated,” said Attorney General Gansler. “Exxon
has the obligation to step up and ensure that every business, landowner,
and family that was directly impacted by the Exxon Valdez oil spill
is made whole again.”
“The State of Alaska certainly believes Exxon is wrong and
has worked very hard preparing a brief to persuade the Supreme
Court to affirm the jury’s award,” said Alaska Attorney
General Talis Colberg. “Holding Exxon accountable for its
actions would encourage those who use our coastal waters to operate
in a careful and safe manner. The State thanks Attorney General
Gansler and his staff for the insight they have provided the Court
on the issues in this case that are of great importance not only
to Alaska, but to all states.”
In 1989, Exxon Valdez spilled 10.8 million gallons of unrefined
Alaskan crude oil into Prince William Sound, creating one of the
largest environmental disasters in U.S. history. The region was
a habitat for salmon, sea otters, seals, sea birds and the great
white shark.
In 1994, in the case of Baker vs. Exxon, an Anchorage jury awarded
$287 million for actual damages (later increased to $504 million)
and $5 billion for punitive damages. Exxon appealed the ruling,
and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ordered the
original judge to reduce the punitive damages. In December 2002,
the judge announced that he had reduced the damages to $4 billion.
Exxon appealed again, sending the case back to court to be considered
in regard to a recent Supreme Court ruling. Punitive damages were
increased to $4.5 billion, plus interest.
In December 2006, the Ninth Circuit reduced the punitive damages
award to $2.5 billion in light of recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings
that placed constitutional limitations on punitive damages. The
Ninth Circuit denied Exxon’s petition for rehearing. On October
29, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court granted Exxon’s petition
for certioriari and will hear oral arguments on February 27, 2008.
An estimated 32,000 claimants represented by up to 60 different
law firms await the outcome of the case. The $2.5 billion award
amounts to approximately $75,000 per plaintiff. More than a third
of class members reside in states other than Alaska. About 20-percent
of the plaintiffs in the case are no longer living.
A total of 33 states have agreed to sign on to Maryland’s
brief including: Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia,
Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi,
Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North
Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, Tennessee, West Virginia,
Hawaii, Idaho, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Carolina,
South Dakota, Utah and Washington.
Click here to view
Brief.
|