| |
For
Immediate Release
July 17, 2002 |
Contact:
Sean Caine, 410-576-6357
|
CURRAN,
10 OTHER STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL PRESS
BUSH ADMINISTRATION ON CLIMATE CHANGE
Attorney
General J. Joseph Curran, Jr., announced that he and Attorneys General
from 10 other states today called on the Bush Administration to
reconsider its position on the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions.
Noting that states are filling the regulatory void left by federal
inaction, the Attorneys General submitted a five-page letter
to the Administration outlining why a national approach to the climate
change problem will actually lead to more cost-effective solutions.
In
a July 17 letter sent to President George W. Bush, Attorneys General
from Alaska, California, Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New
Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont joined
Curran in urging the Bush Administration to take a "strong
national approach" to the environmental and health risks imposed
by climate change that will "better protect the American economy
in the long run."
Identifying
climate change as the "most pressing environmental challenge
of the 21st century," the Attorneys General pointed to a May
2002 report that the United States recently issued as cause for
immediate action. The report, U.S. Climate Action Report 2002, confirms
the dangers of global climate change and projects that its primary
cause, emissions of greenhouse gases - primarily carbon dioxide
produced from the combustion of fossil fuels - will increase by
43 percent by 2020.
"Scientists
around the world are becoming increasingly convinced that greenhouse
gases are putting our resources at risk," Attorney General
Curran said. "With today's action, we hope to convince the
Bush administration of the need to act now to work toward an efficient
solution."
While
the Bush Administration is now acknowledging the negative impacts
of global climate change, the Attorneys General expressed concern
that it has yet to propose a credible plan addressing the findings
and conclusions outlined in its recent report. Rather than proposing
a solution, the recent report focuses on the need to accommodate
coming changes, suggesting, for example, that increased use of air
conditioning should be used to deal with heat-related health impacts.
The Attorneys General likened the Administrations approach
to
former Interior Secretary Hodels suggestion that the government
contend with the hole in the ozone layer by encouraging Americans
to make better use of sunglasses, suntan lotion and broad brimmed
hats.
According
to the State Departments report, global climate change, primarily
caused by greenhouse gas emissions, can result in increased temperatures,
rising sea levels, and increased health risks, as the effects of
climate change can result in illnesses and deaths associated with
temperature extremes, storms and other heavy precipitation events,
air pollution, water contamination, and diseases carried by mosquitoes,
ticks and rodents. A just published study in the journal, Science,
warns of increased risks from insect-borne diseases such as malaria
and yellow fever.
"Not
only have we underestimated the rate at which climate would change,
recent studies indicate that we have underestimated the rate at
which organisms, including insects and others that can transport
disease, are reacting to these changes," said Dr. Paul R. Epstein,
Associate Director of the Center for Health and the Global Environment
at Harvard Medical School. "The question we need to be asking
is not whether we can afford to do something about climate change,
but whether we can afford not to."
In
response to the lack of initiative at the federal level, several
states, including Maryland, are taking steps to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions at the local level. In Massachusetts, state regulations
were adopted last year requiring carbon dioxide reductions by power
plants and in New Hampshire "cap and trade" legislation
was recently enacted. The legislature in California just passed
a bill that will lead to the "maximum feasible" reductions
of carbon dioxide emissions from vehicles. Also, a "carbon
cap" is being considered by elected leaders in New York.
#
|